by Dr. Bruce D. McLaughlin
An algorithm for computing dimensionless physical constants is
illustrated by calculating the Fine Structure Constant. The calculation
is based on algebra and does not employ the principles of
physics.
Introduction
A dimensionless physical constant is an essential numerical
characteristic of space, time, matter and energy expressed as a pure
number. Such constants play a central role in physics because they are
intrinsically invariant under changes in units of measurement.
Historically, these constants were foundational because they could not
be derived from fundamental principles. However, in the 1920’s, Arthur
Eddington pursued the idea that dimensionless physical constants might
be obtainable from pure mathematics. The workings of the universe might
emerge solely from abstract, unit-free mathematics without need of
empirical input, beyond establishing a starting point for calculations.
Eddington’s efforts were generally not successful. This note is intended
to revive his ideas and take them to the next level. The Fine Structure
constant, denoted by
,
is employed for illustration. If the proposed conjecture is
directionally correct, then Arthur Eddington will have been vindicated
on this matter.
Analysis
The fundamental conjecture is that at least one infinite power series
exists in the variable
(dimensionless physical constant),
where,
of the form
()
=
(
= 0 (1)
This power series converges to zero and satisfies the Ratio Test for
convergence.
and
represent two of the four numbers
,
22-6,
2
and
22+6.
The selection of these particular numbers will be addressed later but
other pairs of numbers may be equally satisfactory.
The first term in the series is
.
The second term is
where x and y are selected to make
+
as close to zero as possible. The third term is a simple function of
and
multiplied by
to make
+
+
as small as possible. Each remaining term is of the form
in
which
is a positive integer increasing by 1 with each successive term. If
then
is a positive integer; if
then
is a negative integer. If
then
is a positive integer; if
then
is a negative integer. By choice,
.
A value of
to any known level of precision can be used as a starting point. For
each term after the third,
is viewed as a factor in
.
After calculating
is increased until
if
is negative) is barely greater than the magnitude of the
previous sum. In other words,
Next,
is increased until
is barely less than the magnitude of the previous sum. In other
words,
is barely greater than the magnitude of the previous sum.
Finally, a sign is affixed to the term to ensure that the magnitude of
the next sum is smaller than the magnitude of its predecessor. This rule
is unambiguous and produces a unique term for each index which makes the
series mathematically legitimate. This rule also forces the series to
satisfy the Ratio Test and converge to zero.
This framework, for calculating dimensionless physical constants,
represents a self-consistent, quasi fixed-point model where a particular
constant is defined implicitly by a series whose terms depend on the
constant itself.
Fine Structure Constant
For the Fine Structure constant, Equation (1) can be written as:
()
=
(
= 0 (2)
which converges to zero and satisfies the ratio test for convergence.
The variables b =
22+6
and
= 3.141592...are independent parameters and
= 137.078… which is nearly equal to
=
137.035… The series in Equation (3), used to illustrate the conjecture,
was constructed using a rough estimate for the Fine Structure Constant
of
.
=
+
–
-
+
b
-
+
... (3)
Each remaining term in the series is of the form
and each successive term increases the value of
by 1. The last term in the series is
.
Equation (2) does not apply directly because the series in (3) is not
infinite. Instead, the equation
()
=
(
=
(4)
was used where
can be viewed as a residue. When this truncated series is evaluated,
using the rough estimate
,
the residue,
,
is equal to
-2.732.
Now increase the precision of
by one digit to 0.0072973; the residue
becomes 0.0056324888.... Next increase the precision of
by one more digit to 0.00729735; the residue
becomes 0.0065711919.... This computation can be continued up to a
precision level of about
= 0.007297352564311 which produces a residue of
=
0.0066193341.... This is near the current precision level for
By the fundamental conjecture, the sequence
,
,
,
,
,
... has an upper limit, R. That limit was computed by Mathematica to
be:
R =
This corresponds to a Fine Structure Constant value of:
which compares favorably with the February 2023 value, by Fan et.al.
of:
0.0072973525649(8)
An infinite series built on b,
, and
may allow the Fine Structure Constant to be computed with arbitrary
precision by algebraic manipulation. This might address some of the
concerns of Feynman. If dimensionless physical constants have their
origin in relatively simple infinite series and not in the deep recesses
of quantum mechanics, string theory and relativity, then all mysteries
emanate from mathematics.
Immediately you would like to know where this number for a coupling
comes from: is it related to pi or perhaps to the base of natural
logarithms? Nobody knows. It's one of the greatest damn mysteries of
physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by
humans. You might say the "hand of God" wrote that number, and "we don't
know how He pushed His pencil." We know what kind of a dance to do
experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don't know
what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out –
without putting it in secretly! Feynman, R.
P. (1985). QED:
The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton
University Press. p. 129. ISBN 978-0-691-08388-9
Source of the Parameters
Although the author had a particular reason for selecting the numbers
,
22-6,
2
and
22+6
as potential values for
and
,
the reader does not have to accept the legitimacy of this reason to
accept the legitimacy of the conjecture presented herein. In other
words, the reader can view these four numbers as serendipitous guesses
without affecting the algorithm for determining dimensionless physical
constants. However, in truth, these four numbers were extracted
from the first nine characters of Genesis in the Hebrew
Bible.
Let us begin with
. First invert the character sequence, in the first chapter of Genesis,
so the characters are read from left to right. Next connect the first
three contiguous characters in the first verse of Genesis to form a
string. Now represent each of the Hebrew characters by a base-3 triplet
(column vector) according to a rule that starts with Aleph as
(000)T and ends with Tsadey Final as (222)T. The
three column vectors are
(001T,201T,000T). These three base-3
triplets create a 3 by 3 matrix having the elements 0, 1 and 2:
020
Ayz = 000 (5)
110
The first eigenvector of (Ayz)(Ayz)T is
(,0,1)
where
is the Golden Ratio which is, in turn, related to
by:
π = (5)
cos-1(/2)
(6)
The Golden Ratio and therefore
are therefore concealed in the first three Hebrew characters of
Genesis.
A path to the remaining three numbers is a bit more tedious. First,
introduce the column vectors
(202T,100T,210T) and
(001T,201T,000T) representing the
second three and third three characters in the first verse of Genesis.
These base three triplets create two additional 3 by 3 matrices:
212
Byz = 001 (7)
200
020
Cyz = 000 (8)
110
Note that Ayz and Cyz are identical, so we really have only two
independent matrices with 0, 1 and 2 as elements. Now stack these three
matrices together to form what looks like a Rubic Cube. Each of 15
slices through the cube produces a 3 by 3 array; three slices each
parallel to the yz, zx and xy planes and two diagonal slices
perpendicular to each plane (denoted by X). Each slice can be rotated
about various axes to produce eight 3 by 3 matrices: dihedral group of
order eight (D4). In this trial, only one matrix is selected
for each slice. These 15 matrices can then be combined by matrix
multiplication to form
yz = Ayz.Byz.Cyz.Xyz.Xzy
zx = Azx.Bzx.Czx.Xzx.Xxz (9)
xy = Axy.Bxy.Cxy.Xxy.Xyx
Finally, to create symmetry,
x = yz.yzT
y = zx.zxT (10)
z = xy.xtT
Now use the instructions in the publication “Characteristic
polynomial and higher order traces of third order three dimensional
tensors,” by Guimei Zhang and Shenglong Hu, Front. Math China 2019,
14(1): 225-237 to create a characteristic equation of degree 12. The
non-zero solutions to this equation are
22-6,
22+6,
-2+2,
and
-2-2.
By pure conjecture, the numbers
22-6,
22+6,
2
and
were selected to create various infinite series that satisfied the Ratio
Test and converged to zero.
What are the implications of all these findings? Do they represent a
completely serendipitous concurrence of physics, mathematics and Hebrew
text? Or did our transcendent, immanent, infinite, eternal and immutable
God provide us with a user manual encrypted within His inspired,
inerrant and infallible Word. The first verse of Genesis says:
“In the beginning God created the essence of the heavens and the essence
of the earth.” What a perfect place to encrypt a user manual revealing
the physics and mathematics of this new creation from nothing
(bara). But why would God bother to encrypt a message within a message?
A partial answer might be found in the New Testament.
“For since the creation of the world, God’s invisible qualities – His
eternal power and divine nature – have been clearly seen, being
understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse”
(Romans 1:20).
Only the first nine characters of Genesis have been used in this
article. The concatenated words of the Torah comprise a 304,805 string
of Hebrew characters. What mysteries might be encrypted therein?