Theology Corner

Addressing commonly asked questions about Christianity from the perspective of a non-theologian

Theology Corner

1.)  CAN GOD'S WILL BE THWARTED?

2.)  DID GOD ELECT ONLY A FEW FOR SALVATION WHILE CONDEMNING THE GREATER PART OF MANKIND TO HELL?

3.)  FAITH OR SALVATION: WHICH COMES FIRST?

4.)  DID GOD THE FATHER BEGET JESUS CHRIST?

5.)  WHAT ARE THE TWO NATURES OF CHRIST?

6.)  WHAT IS ANTINOMIANISM?

7.)  WHAT IS SABELLIANISM?

8.)  WHAT IS PELAGIANISM?

9.)  DOES LOVE REALLY WIN?

10.)  IS YOUR WILL REALLY YOUR WILL?

11.)  CAN TWO THEOLOGIES BE TESTED FOR COMPATIBILITY?

12.)  WHAT IS THE FRAUD OF FIDEISM?

13.)  IS CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY COMPATIBLE WITH JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES THEOLOGY?

14.)  IS CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY COMPATIBLE WITH CHRISTIAN SCIENCE THEOLOGY?

15.)  IS CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY COMPATIBLE WITH MORMON THEOLOGY?

16.)  IS CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY COMPATIBLE WITH UNITARIAN UNIVERSALISTS THEOLOGY?

17.)  IS CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY COMPATIBLE WITH SCIENTOLOGY THEOLOGY?

18.)  IS CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY COMPATIBLE WITH UNIFICATION CHURCH THEOLOGY?

19.)  IS CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY COMPATIBLE WITH THE WAY INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGY?

20.)  IS CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY COMPATIBLE WITH THE WORLDWIDE CHURCH OF GOD THEOLOGY?

21.)  IS REPENTANCE REALLY NECESSARY?

22.)  WHAT ARE SOME MUSINGS OF A METHODIST THEOLOGIAN ON LIMITED ATONEMENT?

23.)  WHAT ARE SOME QUESTIONS FOR THOSE WHO TEACH A LIMITED ATONEMENT PROVIDED ONLY FOR THE ELECT OF GOD?

24.)  WHAT WERE CALVIN'S ACTUAL WORDS?

25.)  WHAT IS GNOSTICISM?

26.)  WHAT IS THE UNPARDONABLE SIN?

27.)  IS CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY COMPATIBLE WITH PROGRESSIVE CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY?

1.)  IS CHRISTIANITY COMPATIBLE WITH POSITIVE TOLERANCE?

2.)  CAN WE HAVE A FORM OF GODLINESS, BUT DENY THE POWER THEREOF?

3.)  WHAT IS THE GREAT WAR?

4.)  SHOULD PRESIDENT TRUMP HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED FOR IMMORALITY?

5.)  WHO SAID MOSES WAS HUMBLE?

6.)  COULD CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE BENEFIT FROM WOKE REVISION?

7.)  DID EINSTEIN BELIEVE ALL CHRISTIANS WERE CALVINISTS?

8.)  WHY IS MARXISM A MAGNET?

9.)  WHAT IS TRUE SCIENCE?

10.)  CAN YOU LOSE YOUR SALVATION?

11.)  WHAT ARE THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS?

12.)  WHAT HAPPENED BETWEEN OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS?

13.)  WAS PAUL ENTIRELY SANCTIFIED?

14.)  ARE YOU LIVING IN A WORLD AT WAR?

15.)  WHAT IS THE DIRECT METHOD FOR PROVING A CONDITIONAL PROPOSITION IS TRUE?

16.)  WHAT IS THE CONTRAPOSITIVE METHOD FOR PROVING A CONDITIONAL PROPOSITION IS TRUE?

17.)  WHAT IS THE CONTRADICTION METHOD FOR PROVING A CONDITIONAL PROPOSITION IS TRUE?

18.)  WHAT MIGHT A METHODIST THEOLOGIAN SAY ABOUT PURGATORY?

19.)  WHICH BIBLE PASSAGES ELUCIDATE CORE ASPECTS OF CHRISTIANITY?

20.)  DO SELECTED NIV VERSES ELUCIDATE CORE ASPECTS OF CHRISTIANITY?

21.)  DO SELECTED AKJV VERSES ELUCIDATE CORE ASPECTS OF CHRISTIANITY?

22.)  DO SELECTED YLT VERSES ELUCIDATE CORE ASPECTS OF CHRISTIANITY?

23.)  DO SELECTED 'VOICE' VERSES ELUCIDATE CORE ASPECTS OF CHRISTIANITY?

24.)  COULD THE CONCEPT OF 'SALVATION ONLY FOR THE ELECT' HAVE BEEN ROOTED IN THE MIND OF AUGUSTINE BEFORE HE EMBRACED CHRISTIANITY?

25.)  DID AUGUSTINE RECEIVE PUSHBACK FOR HIS TEACHING OF 'SALVATION ONLY FOR THE ELECT' DURING HIS LIFETIME?

WERE THE CREATION DAYS 24 HOURS IN LENGTH?

The views of a few theologians, whose theological persuasions cover the entire spectrum of mainstream Christianity, are presented in this Section.  Surely, all these men can’t be accused of embracing liberal thinking in order to reconcile science and the Bible.

H. Orton Wiley:  “The Genesis account of creation is primarily a religious document. It cannot be considered a scientific statement, and yet it must not be regarded as contradictory to science. It is rather, a supreme illustration of the manner in which revealed truth indirectly sheds light upon scientific fields.  The Hebrew word yom which is translated “day” occurs no less than 1,480 times in the Old Testament, and is translated by something over fifty different words, including such terms as time, life, today, age, forever, continually and perpetually.  With such a flexible use of the original term, it is impossible to either dogmatize or to demand unswerving restriction to one only of those meanings.  It is frequently assumed that originally orthodox belief held to a solar day of twenty-four hours, and that the church altered her exegesis under the pressure of modern geological discoveries.  This as Dr. Shedd points out is one of the 'errors of ignorance.'  The best Hebrew exegesis has never regarded the days of Genesis as solar days, but as day-periods of indefinite duration.  The doctrine of an immense time prior to the six days of creation was a common view among the earlier fathers and the schoolmen.  Only with the scholastics of the middle-ages and the evangelical writers of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries was this idea current.  Previous to this a profounder view was taught by the acknowledged leaders of the church.  Thus Augustine says, ‘Our seven days resemble the seven days of the Genesis account in being a series, and in having the vicissitudes of morning and evening, but they are multum in pares.’  He calls them natures, and delays or solemn pauses.  Hence they are God-divided days in contradistinction to sun-divided days; they are ineffable days as in their true nature transcendent, while the sun-divided days are due merely to changes in planetary movements.  He affirms, therefore, that the word day does not apply to the duration of time, but to the boundaries of great periods.  Nor is this a metaphorical meaning of the word, but the original, which signifies ‘to put period to’ or to denote a self-completed time.  Origen, Irenaeus, Basil and Gregory Nazianzen taught the same doctrine during the patristic period, as did also many of the learned Jewish doctors outside the Christian Church.  Later writers holding this view are Hahn, Hensler, Knapp, Lee, Henry, More, Burnett and others.  Of the more recent writers we may mention Hodge, Pope, Miley, Cocker and Stearns."  (Wiley, v1, p 454-456)

Francis A. Schaeffer:  “What does day mean in the days of creation?  The answer must be held with some openness.  In Genesis 5:2 we read: ‘Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.’  As it is clear that Adam and Eve were not created simultaneously, day in Genesis 5:2 does not mean a period of twenty-four hours….In other places in the Old Testament, the Hebrew word day refers to an era, just as it often does in English.  See, for example, Isaiah 2:11, 12, 17 for such a usage.  The simple fact is that day in Hebrew (just as in English) is used in three separate senses, to mean: (1) twenty-four hours, (2) the period of light during the twenty-four hours, and (3) an indeterminate period of time.  Therefore, we must leave open the exact length of time indicated by day in Genesis.”  (Schaeffer, v2, p 39)

James Oliver Buswell:  “When we say that the word day is used figuratively, we mean that it represents a period of time of undesignated length and unspecified boundaries, merging into other days or periods….The figurative use of the word day is very common in the Scripture.  The day of the Lord and that day are expressions commonly used by the prophets to point to complexes of events covering a considerable period of time….In Genesis 2:4 we read, ‘These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.’  The only possible way in which six days can be referred to as one day is the figurative use of the word day….The fourth commandment, Exodus 20:8-11, is brought forward as evidence against the figurative interpretation of the word day in the first chapter of Genesis.  The Scripture says, ‘Six days shalt thou labor and do all thy work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God…for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day, wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.’  If we had no other example of Moses’ language, this passage might be taken as evidence for a twenty-four hour creative day, but we have Scriptural evidence that Moses made a radical distinction between God’s attitude toward time and the attitude of man.  What Moses is saying, in the total Scriptural context, must be understood as teaching that man should observe a periodicity in the ratio of work to rest, of six days to one day, because God in the creation set an example of an analogous periodicity of six and one of his kind of days.”  (Buswell, Part 1, p 144-145)

Thomas C. Oden:  “The word day (yom) has several levels of meaning.  It is used in biblical Hebrew to mean not only a twenty-four-hour day but also a time of divine visitation or judgment, or an indefinite period of time, as in Psalms 110:5, Isaiah 2:11, 12, and Jeremiah 11:4-7, 17:16.  To insist on a twenty-four-hour day as the word’s only meaning is to intrude upon the text and to disallow the poetic, metaphorical, and symbolic speech of Scripture….The creative activity of God is viewed in a pattern of six days or periods…”  (Oden, v1, p 234)

Charles Hodge:  " ....the word day is used in Scripture in many different senses; sometimes for the time the sun is above the horizon; sometimes for a period of twenty-four hours; sometimes for a year, as in Lev 25:29, Judges 17:10 and elsewhere; sometimes for an indefinite period, as in the phrases 'the day of your calamity, the day of salvation, the day of the Lord and the day of judgment.'  And in this account of creation it is used for the period of light in antithesis to night; for the separate periods in the progress of creation; and then for the whole period (Genesis 2:4): 'In the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens'....if the word day be taken in the sense of 'an indefinite period of time,' a sense which it undoubtedly has in other parts of Scripture, there is not only no discrepancy between the Mosaic account of the creation and the assumed facts of geology, but there is a most marvelous coincidence between them."  (Hodge, v1, p 570-571)

John Miley:  “While the Scriptures are divine, their interpretation is human, and new facts may help to a truer rendering.  However, the new rendering is new only to the common view of the later Christian centuries.  All along the centuries, and without any exterior pressure, such a sense has been given, and by most eminent Christian authors  -- for instance, Augustine and Aquinas…An indefinite and prolonged duration of these days is not therefore a new meaning forced upon Christian interpreters by the discoveries of modern science, but an earlier one which, in the view of many, the interior facts of the narrative required.  On a casual reading of this record, the days of creation would be taken in a literal sense.  In this case, however, as in many others, a deeper insight may modify the first view.  The question has no decision on purely philological ground for the reason that yom is used in both a definite and indefinite sense…As yom – day – is so frequently used in both senses, we must look to the connection for its meaning in any particular place…For the first three [creation]  days there was no ruling office of the sun to determine their time measure.  Nor is there any apparent law of limitation to a solar measure.  There is nothing in the direct account of these three days against the sense of indefinite and long periods.  This is the most rational interpretation.”  (Miley, v1, p 303-304)

William Burt Pope:  The authoritative account of Creation found in Genesis is not, of course, what in modern language would be called scientific…However the days are interpreted they embrace the sum of things…Accordingly, we may understand the sublime description to mean that the enormous cycles of creative activity, the epochs of God, whose periods are not as ours, are presented to us in our history as human epochs…The first day is the most comprehensive, including all down to the production of light: one period of untold duration which it pleased God to call a human day, with its evening and morning.  The last day is the long sabbatic rest with God, with man it is the hallowed day of rest.  It is quite consistent with this that the record of the first day is left in such obscurity.  It is in harmony with the simplicity of the early record to leave the unwritten history of the primitive earth to the researches of science, for which the Spirit of revelation has reserved this honour…The days of the first chapter of Genesis are creative days.  (Pope, v1, p 396-398)

 

The length of a creative day, an annoying conundrum which riles Christians to battle, is not a mystery which science must solve.  It is not an issue of fossil evidence, radiometric dating, dendrochronology, geology, plate tectonics, Hubble’s parameter, the red shift or any other aspect of science.  This conundrum is a purely theological issue focused on the meaning of the Hebrew word yom as used in the first chapter of Genesis.  As expressed so aptly by H. Orton Wiley, “The Hebrew word yom which is translated “day” occurs no less than 1,480 times in the Old Testament, and is translated by something over fifty different words, including such terms as time, life, today, age, forever, continually and perpetually.  With such a flexible use of the original term, it is impossible to either dogmatize or to demand unswerving restriction to one only of those meanings.”

Only in recent history, have some vocal Christians declared the ‘24-hour creation day’ to be a Core Belief of Christianity.  This has created a roadblock for evangelism, discipleship and enlarging the fellowship of believers, in other words, an unnecessary roadblock for the Great Commission. (See also Sections 14.2 and 14.3 of Theology Corner)